<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://epa.sagepub.com">
<title>Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis current issue</title>
<link>http://epa.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>September 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0162-3737</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/203?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/236?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/281?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://epa.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://epa.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis</title>
<url>http://epa.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://epa.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/203?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[District Policy and Teachers' Social Networks]]></title>
<link>http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/203?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Policy makers increasingly include provisions aimed at fostering professional community as part of reform initiatives. Yet little is known about the impact of policy on teachers&rsquo; professional relations in schools. Drawing theoretically from social capital theory and methodologically from qualitative social network analysis, this article explores how district policies influence teachers&rsquo; social networks in eight elementary schools in two districts involved in the scale-up of mathematics curriculum. It is argued that policy affects whom teachers seek out for discussion of mathematics instruction but that differences in policy provisions lead to variations in the nature and quality of interactions. Furthermore, school leaders mediate district policy, thereby influencing these patterns of interaction. By uncovering the dynamics by which policy influences teachers&rsquo; social networks, this article contributes to understandings of the factors that foster the development of social capital. It also uncovers opportunities for intervention for those designing policy initiatives to support implementation of instructional innovations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coburn, C. E., Russell, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.3102/0162373708321829</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[District Policy and Teachers' Social Networks]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Educational Research Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>30</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>235</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/236?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Credits, Time, and Attainment: Articulation Policies and Success After Transfer]]></title>
<link>http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/236?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>While state legislatures are increasingly enacting articulation policies, research to date provides little evidence that these policies enhance students&rsquo; likelihood of transfer. Based on a careful historical review of state statutes, the authors propose that articulation policies do not improve transfer rates because that is not their intended purpose; the main goal of articulation policies is to prevent the loss of credits when students transfer within state higher education systems. Subsequently, the authors use the National Education Longitudinal Study to evaluate articulation policies based on an alternative set of outcomes: attainment of a bachelor&rsquo;s degree, time to degree, and credits required to complete a bachelor&rsquo;s degree. They discuss the limitations of existing data and propose that future studies be designed to specifically evaluate the transfer or loss of credits applicable toward general education requirements.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roksa, J., Keith, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.3102/0162373708321383</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Credits, Time, and Attainment: Articulation Policies and Success After Transfer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Educational Research Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>30</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Winners and Losers: Changes in Texas University Admissions Post-Hopwood]]></title>
<link>http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article evaluates changes in racial and ethnic composition of three Texas universities following the ban on affirmative action imposed by the 1996 <I>Hopwood</I> decision. The authors estimate the extent to which universities practiced affirmative action before the ban and evaluate how officers at these universities responded by changing relative weights accorded to various applicant characteristics. After assessing whether changes in the relative weights favored minority applicants, the degree to which these new policies succeeded in maintaining minority shares at their pre-<I>Hopwood</I> levels is simulated. This article finds that these universities complied with the Hopwood ruling such that direct advantages given to Black and Hispanic applicants disappeared (and in some cases became disadvantages). Although there is some evidence that universities changed the weights they placed on applicant characteristics in ways that aided underrepresented minority applicants, these changes were insufficient to restore Black and Hispanic applicants&rsquo; share of admitted students.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Long, M. C., Tienda, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.3102/0162373708321384</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Winners and Losers: Changes in Texas University Admissions Post-Hopwood]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Educational Research Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>30</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>280</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Small High Schools on a Larger Scale: The Impact of School Conversions in Chicago]]></title>
<link>http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study examines 4 years of small school reform in Chicago, focusing on schools formed by converting large traditional high schools into small autonomous ones. Analyzing systemwide survey and outcome data, the authors assess the assumptions embedded in the reform&rsquo;s theory of change. They find that these schools are characterized by more collegial and committed teacher contexts and more academically and personally supportive student contexts. There is some evidence of decreased dropout rates and increased graduation rates for the first cohort of students but not for the second cohort. The authors do not find stronger instruction, nor do they find student achievement has improved. They discuss implications for reformers and policy makers who are interested in small schools in particular and high school reform in general.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kahne, J. E., Sporte, S. E., de la Torre, M., Easton, J. Q.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.3102/0162373708319184</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Small High Schools on a Larger Scale: The Impact of School Conversions in Chicago]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Educational Research Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>30</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>