This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Roach, A. T. Articles by Elliott, S. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Influence of Access to General Education Curriculum on Alternate Assessment Performance of Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities

Vanderbilt University

The primary purpose of this investigation was to understand the influence of access to the general curriculum on the performance of students with significant cognitive disabilities, as measured by the Wisconsin Alternate Assessment (WAA) for Students with Disabilities. Special education teachers (N = 113) submitted case materials for students with significant disabilities who were assessed using the WAA. Cases included WAA rating scales, students’ individualized education programs (IEPs), and a curricular access questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the influence of curricular access on students’ WAA performance. Students’ scores on the WAA Reading, Language Arts, and Mathematics scales were included in the model as the indicators for the latent factor—student performance. Student grade level, teacher reports of students’ curricular access, percentage of academic focused IEP goals, and time spent in general education settings were included as predictors of students’ performance. Results indicated the model accounted for 41% of the variance in the latent factor of student performance. Implications of these results are discussed for the validity of WAA scores and the design of professional development and teacher support materials.

Key Words: accountability • alternate assessment • curricular access • students with disabilities

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 28, No. 2, 181-194 (2006)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737028002181


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Decker and S. E. Bolt Challenges and Opportunities for Promoting Student Achievement Through Large-Scale Assessment Results: Research, Reflections, and Future Directions Assessment for Effective Intervention, December 1, 2008; 34(1): 43 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Karvonen, S. Y. Wakeman, C. Flowers, and D. M. Browder Measuring the Enacted Curriculum for Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities: A Preliminary Investigation Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2007; 33(1): 29 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Alisa Lowrey, E. Drasgow, A. Renzaglia, and L. Chezan Impact of Alternate Assessment on Curricula for Students With Severe Disabilities: Purpose Driven or Process Driven? Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2007; 32(4): 244 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]