Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLendon, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Deaton, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Called to Account: Analyzing the Origins and Spread of State Performance-Accountability Policies for Higher Education

Michael K. McLendon, James C. Hearn and Russ Deaton

Vanderbilt University

Employing a theoretical framework derived from the policy innovation and diffusion literature, this research examines how variations over time and across state sociopolitical systems influence states’ adoption of accountability policies in higher education. Specifically, factors influencing the adoption of three kinds of performance-accountability policies for public higher education in the period 1979–2002 were investigated. Findings from the event history analysis supported the authors’ original hypotheses only in part; the primary drivers of policy adoption were legislative party strength and higher-education governance arrangements, but the direction of these influences varied across the policies studied.

Key Words: accountability • event history analysis • governance • higher education • policy adoption • state politics

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1-24 (2006)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737028001001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PubliusHome page
R. C. Lowry
Reauthorization of the Federal Higher Education Act and Accountability for Student Learning: The Dog that Didn't Bark
Publius, June 1, 2009; 39(3): 506 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
M. McLendon, D. E. Heller, and S. Lee
High School to College Transition Policy in the American States: Conceptual and Analytic Perspectives on Conducting Across-State Study
Educational Policy, March 1, 2009; 23(2): 385 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
J. Lee
Is Test-Driven External Accountability Effective? Synthesizing the Evidence From Cross-State Causal-Comparative and Correlational Studies
Review of Educational Research, September 1, 2008; 78(3): 608 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
W. R. Doyle
Adoption of Merit-Based Student Grant Programs: An Event History Analysis
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(3): 259 - 285.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page