Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Louis, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schroeder, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 2, 177-204 (2005)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737027002177


Articles

State-Mandated Accountability in High Schools: Teachers’ Interpretations of a New Era

Karen Seashore Louis, Karen Febey and Roger Schroeder

University of Minnesota

This article addresses conflicting statements about the impact of accountability policies in which some argue that testing undermines good teaching, while others claim that it stimulates improvement. The authors begin with the assumption that it is important to explore implementers’ cognitive perspectives in order to understand a policy’s effects. Using a sensemaking perspective, they examine teachers’ responses to accountability in three high schools selected because they were deemed to have a strong teacher culture that supported quality education. The schools were located in states with diverse histories of accountability legislation, but in districts with well-established local accountability policies. Findings suggested that sensemaking activity occurred in all three schools and was associated with teachers’ interpretation of accountability policies and with their efforts to change classroom practice to be consistent with accountability policies. Active efforts by district-level administrators to mediate sensemaking affected teachers’ attitudes toward accountability policies and standards-driven reform.

Key Words: accountability policy • teachers


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
H. Mintrop and T. Trujillo
The Practical Relevance of Accountability Systems for School Improvement: A Descriptive Analysis of California Schools
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, December 1, 2007; 29(4): 319 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
C. E. Coburn
Framing the Problem of Reading Instruction: Using Frame Analysis to Uncover the Microprocesses of Policy Implementation
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2006; 43(3): 343 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page