This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Liu, E. Articles by Peske, H. G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

New Teachers and the Massachusetts Signing Bonus: The Limits of Inducements

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Susan Moore Johnson and Heather G. Peske

Harvard Graduate School of Education

In 1998, Massachusetts instituted a $20,000 Signing Bonus to address concerns about the supply of quality teachers. This article reports on a longitudinal, qualitative study of the experiences of 13 of the original 59 recipients of the Signing Bonus, and analyzes their responses to various incentives embedded within the Massachusetts Signing Bonus Program (MSBP). Interviews revealed that the bonus money had very little influence on recipients’ decisions to enter teaching. Far more important was the alternate certification program created to implement the policy. Findings suggest that the MSBP: (a) relied too much on inducements and not enough on capacity-building; (b) focused too narrowly on recruitment and not enough on retention, and (c) centered too much on individuals and not enough on schools.

Key Words: incentives • new teachers • pay • policy instruments • teacher recruitment • teacher retention

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 3, 217-236 (2004)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737026003217


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?