This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carnoy, M. Articles by Loeb, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis

Stanford University

We developed a zero-to-five index of the strength of accountability in 50 states based on the use of high-stakes testing to sanction and reward schools, and analyzed whether that index is related to student gains on the NAEP mathematics test in 1996–2000. The study also relates the index to changes in student retention in the 9th grade and to changes in high school completion rates over the same period. The results show that students in high-accountability states averaged significantly greater gains on the NAEP 8th-grade math test than students in states with little or no state measures to improve student performance. Furthermore, students in high-accountability states do not have significantly higher retention or lower high school completion rates.

Key Words: capacity building • external accountability • high school survival rates • high stakes • inclusion/exclusion • retention rates • standards-based reforms • state assessment • student performance • test scores

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Shelly Rebels and Their Causes: State Resistance to No Child Left Behind Publius, May 7, 2008; (2008) pjn008v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Yeh The Cost-Effectiveness of Five Policies for Improving Student Achievement American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2007; 28(4): 416 - 436. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. O'Malley Borg, J. P. Plumlee, and H. A. Stranahan Plenty of Children Left Behind: High-Stakes Testing and Graduation Rates in Duval County, Florida Educational Policy, November 1, 2007; 21(5): 695 - 716. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Fuller, J. Wright, K. Gesicki, and E. Kang Gauging Growth: How to Judge No Child Left Behind? Educational Researcher, June 1, 2007; 36(5): 268 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. McDermott "Expanding the Moral Community" or "Blaming the Victim"? The Politics of State Education Accountability Policy American Educational Research Journal, March 1, 2007; 44(1): 77 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Warren, K. N. Jenkins, and R. B. Kulick High School Exit Examinations and State-Level Completion and GED Rates, 1975 Through 2002 Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(2): 131 - 152. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Warren and M. R. Edwards High School Exit Examinations and High School Completion: Evidence From the Early 1990s Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2005; 27(1): 53 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. C. Hill, B. Rowan, and D. L. Ball Effects of Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2005; 42(2): 371 - 406. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. S. Louis, K. Febey, and R. Schroeder State-Mandated Accountability in High Schools: Teachers' Interpretations of a New Era Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2005; 27(2): 177 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Lee and K. K. Wong The Impact of Accountability on Racial and Socioeconomic Equity: Considering Both School Resources and Achievement Outcomes American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2004; 41(4): 797 - 832. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Hamilton Chapter 2: Assessment as a Policy Tool Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2003; 27(1): 25 - 68. [PDF]