This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Reynolds, A. J. Articles by Mann, E. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Age 21 Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Judy A. Temple

Northern Illinois University

Dylan L. Robertson and Emily A. Mann

University of Wisconsin-Madison

We conducted the first cost-benefit analysis of a federally financed, comprehensive early childhood program. The Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers are located in public schools and provide educational and family support services to low-income children from ages 3 to 9. Using data from a cohort of 1,539 program and comparison-group children born in 1980 who participate in the Chicago Longitudinal Study, measures of program participation were significantly associated with greater school achievement, higher rates of high school completion, and with significantly lower rates of remedial education services, juvenile delinquency, and child maltreatment. Economic analyses indicated that the measured and projected economic benefits of preschool participation, school-age participation, and extended program participation exceeded costs. In present-value 1998 dollars, the preschool program provided a return to society of $7.14 per dollar invested by increasing economic well-being and tax revenues, and by reducing public expenditures for remedial education, criminal justice treatment, and crime victims. The extended intervention program (4 to 6 years of participation) provided a return to society of $6.11 per dollar invested while the school-age program yielded a return of $1.66 per dollar invested. Findings demonstrate that an established public program can provide benefits that far exceed costs. Key elements of CPC program effectiveness include an instructional focus on literacy, opportunities for intensive parent involvement, and implementation by well-trained staff within a single administrative system.

Key Words: cost-benefit analysis • early childhood intervention • longitudinal studies • urban education

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 4, 267-303 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737024004267


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Reynolds, L. C. Mathieson, and J. W. Topitzes Do Early Childhood Interventions Prevent Child Maltreatment?: A Review of Research Child Maltreat, May 1, 2009; 14(2): 182 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. M. Levin The Economic Payoff to Investing in Educational Justice Educational Researcher, January 1, 2009; 38(1): 5 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Bassok, D. French, B. Fuller, and S. Lynn Kagan do child care centers benefit poor children after school entry? Journal of Early Childhood Research, October 1, 2008; 6(3): 211 - 231. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Nores, C. R. Belfield, W. S. Barnett, and L. Schweinhart Updating the Economic Impacts of the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2005; 27(3): 245 - 261. [Abstract] [PDF]