This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nye, B. Articles by Konstantopoulos, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Do Low-Achieving Students Benefit More from Small Classes? Evidence from the Tennessee Class Size Experiment

Tennessee State University

Larry V. Hedges and Spyros Konstantopoulos

The University of Chicago

Recent evidence about the effects of class size on academic achievement from randomized experiments points to positive effects of small classes. However, the evidence about the mechanism producing these effects is less clear. Some scholars have argued for mechanisms that would imply greater effects of small classes for low-achieving students. This article investigates possible differential effects of small classes on achievement using data from Project STAR, a four-year, large-scale randomized experiment on the effects of class size. We examined the differential effects of small classes for students in the bottom half and bottom quarter, respectively, of their class's achievement distribution in kindergarten. Although small class effects are somewhat larger for low-achieving students in reading, the differential effects (interactions) are not statistically significant. Moreover, the small class effects for low-achieving students in mathematics are actually smaller than those for higher achieving students. Thus while there are unambiguous positive effects of small classes on achievement, there is no evidence for differentially larger effects of small classes for lower achieving students.

Key Words: at-risk students • class size • education production function

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 3, 201-217 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737024003201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. L. Strayhorn Different Folks, Different Hopes: The Educational Aspirations of Black Males in Urban, Suburban, and Rural High Schools Urban Education, November 1, 2009; 44(6): 710 - 731. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Milesi and A. Gamoran Effects of Class Size and Instruction on Kindergarten Achievement Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(4): 287 - 313. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. M. Desimone, T. Smith, D. Baker, and K. Ueno Assessing Barriers to the Reform of U.S. Mathematics Instruction From an International Perspective American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2005; 42(3): 501 - 535. [Abstract] [PDF]