Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 3, 175-199 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737024003175
© 2002 American Educational Research Association

Articles

Randomized Experiments in Educational Policy Research: A Critical Examination of the Reasons the Educational Evaluation Community has Offered for not Doing Them

Thomas D. Cook

Northwestern University

This article notes the paucity with which reform efforts in education have been evaluated experimentally, despite well-nigh universal acknowledgement that experiments provide the best justification for causal conclusions. And of the few experiments that have been completed, most were done by groups outside of the community of educational evaluators working in schools and colleges of education. The reasons educational evaluators cite for not doing experiments are critically appraised. Some are shown to be wrong or over-generalized; and others point to the need for future experiments that depend more heavily on program theory and the assessment of implementation and other intervening processes. The alternatives to experiments that educational evaluators prefer are briefly appraised and found wanting whenever a high standard is needed for justifying causal conclusions.

Key Words: educational policy • experiments • objections to experimentation • random assignment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
D. H. Clements and J. Sarama
Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of a Research-Based Preschool Mathematics Curriculum
American Educational Research Journal, June 1, 2008; 45(2): 443 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Community College ReviewHome page
H. M. Levin and J. C. Calcagno
Remediation in the Community College: An Evaluator's Perspective
Community College Review, January 1, 2008; 35(3): 181 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
G. T. Henry, C. S. Gordon, and D. K. Rickman
Early Education Policy Alternatives: Comparing Quality and Outcomes of Head Start and State Prekindergarten
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(1): 77 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
B. G. Moss and W. H. Yeaton
Shaping Policies Related to Developmental Education: An Evaluation Using the Regression-Discontinuity Design
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(3): 215 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
C. Milesi and A. Gamoran
Effects of Class Size and Instruction on Kindergarten Achievement
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(4): 287 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
G. D. Borman, R. E. Slavin, A. Cheung, A. M. Chamberlain, N. A. Madden, and B. Chambers
Success for All: First-Year Results From the National Randomized Field Trial
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2005; 27(1): 1 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page