This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lacireno-Paquet, N. Articles by Henig, J. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Creaming Versus Cropping: Charter School Enrollment Practices in Response to Market Incentives

The George Washington University

Jeffrey R. Henig

Teachers College, Columbia University

Proponents of school choice present market-based competition as a means of leveling disparities between race, class and performance in public school systems. Opponents see school choice as threatening to exacerbate this problem because competition for students will pressure individual schools into targeting students with the highest performance and the least encumbered with personal and social disadvantages. We suggest that some charter schools, by background and affiliation, are likely to be more market-oriented in their behavior than others, and test the proposition that market-oriented charter schools engage in cream-skimming while others disproportionately serve highly disadvantaged students. Comparing student composition in market-oriented charter schools, nonmarket-oriented charter schools, and traditional public schools in Washington, DC, we find little evidence that market-oriented charters are focusing on an elite clientele, but they are less likely than the other two types of schools to serve some high need populations. Rather than skimming the cream off the top of the potential student population, market-oriented charter schools may be "cropping off" service to students whose language or special education needs make them more costly to educate.

Key Words: charter schools • cream skimming • disadvantaged students • educational management organizations (EMOs) • school choice

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 2, 145-158 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737024002145


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. R. Garcia The Impact of School Choice on Racial Segregation in Charter Schools Educational Policy, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 805 - 829. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. K.-c. Tse Choices for Whom?: The Rhetoric and Reality of the Direct Subsidy Scheme in Hong Kong (1988-2006) Education and Urban Society, July 1, 2008; 40(5): 628 - 652. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. R. Garcia Academic and Racial Segregation in Charter Schools: Do Parents Sort Students Into Specialized Charter Schools? Education and Urban Society, July 1, 2008; 40(5): 590 - 612. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Eckes and A. E. Trotter Are Charter Schools Using Recruitment Strategies to Increase Student Body Diversity? Education and Urban Society, November 1, 2007; 40(1): 62 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Buckley and M. Schneider Are Charter School Students Harder to Educate? Evidence From Washington, D.C. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2005; 27(4): 365 - 380. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. M. Levin and C. R. Belfield Chapter 6: The Marketplace in Education Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2003; 27(1): 183 - 219. [PDF]