This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Swanson, C. B. Articles by Stevenson, D. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Standards-Based Reform in Practice: Evidence on State Policy and Classroom Instruction from the NAEP State Assessments

Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University

David Lee Stevenson

Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy

The movement for higher standards in American education has attracted considerable public and scholarly attention during the past decade. Largely due to significant methodological challenges, however, there has been limited empirical investigation of the structure and operation of this movement on a nationwide scale. This paper develops an empirical strategy for studying broad-based educational change employing quantitative methods and an extensive database consisting of state policy indicators and data on schools and classrooms from a large number of states participating in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) State Assessments in Mathematics. Two main elements of standards-based reform are examined: (a) correspondence between the structure of the national standards movement and patterns of state-level policy activism, and (b) linkages between state policy and classroom instructional practices. The results of a Rasch measurement analysis indicate that patterns of state policy activity closely resemble standards-based reform, as it is known as a national movement. Multilevel statistical modeling using data from a large longitudinal panel of schools further shows that state activism has a significant independent effect on teachers’ use of classroom practices consistent with a standards-based model of mathematics education. While of a modest size, this state policy effect remains robust after taking into consideration other conditions at the classroom, school, and state levels, including the prior use of standards-based instruction for schools and states. Evidence also suggests that these policy effects on instruction may operate by promoting greater teacher receptivity to reform, particularly through relevant professional development experiences.

Key Words: classroom instruction • mathematics • NAEP • standards-based reform • state policy

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1-27 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737024001001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Seashore Louis, E. Thomas, M. F. Gordon, and K. S. Febey State Leadership for School Improvement: An Analysis of Three States Educational Administration Quarterly, October 1, 2008; 44(4): 562 - 592. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Lee Is Test-Driven External Accountability Effective? Synthesizing the Evidence From Cross-State Causal-Comparative and Correlational Studies Review of Educational Research, September 1, 2008; 78(3): 608 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. W. Wolfe, S. G. Viger, D. W. Jarvinen, and J. Linksman Validation of Scores From a Measure of Teachers' Efficacy Toward Standards-Aligned Classroom Assessment Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2007; 67(3): 460 - 474. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Stecher, V.-N. Le, L. Hamilton, G. Ryan, A. Robyn, and J. R. Lockwood Using Structured Classroom Vignettes to Measure Instructional Practices in Mathematics Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(2): 101 - 130. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Lee and K. K. Wong The Impact of Accountability on Racial and Socioeconomic Equity: Considering Both School Resources and Achievement Outcomes American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2004; 41(4): 797 - 832. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Hamilton, D. F. McCaffrey, B. M. Stecher, S. P. Klein, A. Robyn, and D. Bugliari Studying Large-Scale Reforms of Instructional Practice: An Example from Mathematics and Science Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2003; 25(1): 1 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Hamilton Chapter 2: Assessment as a Policy Tool Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2003; 27(1): 25 - 68. [PDF]