This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cogan, L. S. Articles by Wiley, D. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Who Takes What Math and in Which Track? Using TIMSS to Characterize U.S. Students’ Eighth-Grade Mathematics Learning Opportunities

Michigan State University

William H. Schmidt

Michigan State University

David E. Wiley

Northwestern University

This article examines the range of eighth-grade mathematics learning opportunities in the United States, drawing on data gathered for the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Sources of variation in the provision of learning opportunities are identified, and patterns in eighth-grade mathematics course offerings are compared across schools. Comparison of students’ learning opportunities includes consideration of the specific course in which they were enrolled, the type of textbook employed for the course, and the proportion of time teachers devoted to teaching specific topics. Analyses revealed a mismatch between the mathematics course title and the textbook employed in the course for nearly 30% of U.S. eighth-grade students. Course-textbook combinations demonstrated significant relationships with the time teachers devoted to specific topics and the international topic difficulty score. Some differences in mathematics learning opportunities were found on the basis of a school’s location (urban, rural, suburban), size, and percentage of minority enrollment. We contend that the significant relationships found were not consistent enough to provide a satisfactory explanation for the observed variation and that individual student differences, which often provide an implicit rationale for tracking, also represent an inadequate explanation for the observed diversity in curricular opportunities. We conclude that recognizing the multiple definitions for students’ classroom mathematics learning experiences is an important step in reform and policy discussions.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 23, No. 4, 323-341 (2001)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737023004323


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. C. Burris, J. P. Heubert, and H. M. Levin Accelerating Mathematics Achievement Using Heterogeneous Grouping American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2006; 43(1): 137 - 154. [Abstract] [PDF]