Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koretz, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Assessment of Students With Disabilities in Kentucky: Inclusion, Student Performance, and Validity

Daniel Koretz and Laura Hamilton

RAND Education and the Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing

Students with disabilities are increasingly being included in large-scale, high-stakes testing programs, despite a lack of evidence regarding the validity of scores from many tests for these students. This study examines Kentucky's efforts to include students with disabilities in its statewide assessment. We explore the level of inclusion achieved, the kinds of assessment accommodations offered, the performance of students with disabilities, and the relationships between performance and the use of accommodations on both multiple-choice and open-response formats. Results indicate that most students were included in the assessment, but that the scores obtained by some students may not be trustworthy due to inappropriate use of accommodations. We discuss the implications of these results for research and policy.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 3, 255-272 (2000)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737022003255


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
D.-H. Kim, C. Schneider, and T. Siskind
Examining the Underlying Factor Structure of a Statewide Science Test Under Oral and Standard Administrations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, August 1, 2009; 27(4): 323 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
M. L. Cox, J. G. Herner, M. J. Demczyk, and J. J. Nieberding
Provision of Testing Accommodations for Students With Disabilities on Statewide Assessments: Statistical Links With Participation and Discipline Rates
Remedial and Special Education, December 1, 2006; 27(6): 346 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
S. E. Bolt and M. L. Thurlow
Five of the Most Frequently Allowed Testing Accommodations in State Policy: Synthesis of Research
Remedial and Special Education, June 1, 2004; 25(3): 141 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
L. Hamilton
Chapter 2: Assessment as a Policy Tool
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2003; 27(1): 25 - 68.
[PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page