Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, V. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Inside Large and Small High Schools: Curriculum and Social Relations

Valerie E. Lee

University of Michigan

Becky A. Smerdon

American Institutes for Research

Corinne Alfeld-Liro

Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin

Shelly L. Brown

Johns Hopkins University

This paper investigates how enrollment size influences two organizational features of schools: curriculum and social relations. We interview teachers, principals, guidance counselors, and students in six public high schools (large and small schools in urban, suburban, and rural locations) and three schools of choice: two Catholic schools (one large, one small) and a small public school. All school members saw size as important. In small schools, student head counts translated directly into revenue that "bought" faculty and facilities. In large schools, members worried about anonymity. Social relations were more personal in the small high schools, although sometimes to students' detriment. Curriculum offerings in the small public schools, necessarily modest, were targeted toward the middle of the ability distribution. Although students in the large and small public schools were free to choose among a broad array of courses, the Catholic high schools offered a mostly academic curriculum to all students. Policy issues, especially about making schools smaller and basing the high school curriculum on a full "student choice model," are discussed.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 2, 147-171 (2000)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737022002147


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
K. Leithwood and D. Jantzi
A Review of Empirical Evidence About School Size Effects: A Policy Perspective
Review of Educational Research, March 1, 2009; 79(1): 464 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
R. Yamaguchi, P. M. O'Malley, and L. D. Johnston
Relationships Between School Drug Searches and Student Substance Use in U.S. Schools
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2004; 26(4): 329 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
H. Ayalon
Mathematics and Sciences Course Taking Among Arab Students in Israel: A Case of Unexpected Gender Equality
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2002; 24(1): 63 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page