This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hanushek, E. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Some Findings From an Independent Investigation of the Tennessee STAR Experiment and From Other Investigations of Class Size Effects

University of Rochester and National Bureau of Economic Research

While random-assignment experiments have considerable conceptual appeal, the validity and reliability of results depends crucially on a number of design and implementation issues. This paper reviews the major experiment in class size reduction-Tennessee’s Project STAR-and puts the results in the context of existing nonexperimental evidence about class size. The nonexperimental evidence uniformly indicates no consistent improvement in achievement with class size reductions. This evidence comes from very different sources and methodologies, making the consistency of results quite striking. The experimental evidence from the STAR experiment is typically cited as providing strong support of current policy proposals to reduce class size. Detailed review of the evidence, however uncovers a number of important design and implementation issues that suggest considerable uncertainty about the magnitude of any treatment effects. Moreover there is reason to believe that the commonly cited results are biased upwards. Ignoring consideration of the uncertainties and possible biases in the experiment, the results show effects that are limited to very large (and expensive) reductions in kindergarten or possibly first grade class sizes. No support for smaller reductions in class size (i.e., reductions resulting in class sizes greater than 13–17 students) or for reductions in later grades is found in the STAR results.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 2, 143-163 (1999)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737021002143


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. N. Harris Toward Policy-Relevant Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes: Combining Effects With Costs Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, March 1, 2009; 31(1): 3 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Jepsen and S. Rivkin Class Size Reduction and Student Achievement: The Potential Tradeoff between Teacher Quality and Class Size J. Human Resources, January 1, 2009; 44(1): 223 - 250. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Graue, K. Hatch, K. Rao, and D. Oen The Wisdom of Class-Size Reduction American Educational Research Journal, September 1, 2007; 44(3): 670 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Milesi and A. Gamoran Effects of Class Size and Instruction on Kindergarten Achievement Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2006; 28(4): 287 - 313. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hannaway and N. Woodroffe Chapter 1: Policy Instruments in Education Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2003; 27(1): 1 - 24. [PDF]

				D. K. Cohen, S. W. Raudenbush, and D. L. Ball Resources, Instruction, and Research Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2003; 25(2): 119 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. M. Thum and S. K. Bhattacharya Detecting a Change in School Performance: A Bayesian Analysis for a Multilevel Join Point Problem Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2001; 26(4): 443 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Stasz and B. M. Stecher Teaching Mathematics and Language Arts in Reduced Size and Non-Reduced Size Classrooms Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2000; 22(4): 313 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]