|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
High School Size: Which Works Best and for Whom?
Valerie E. Lee and
Julia B. Smith
University of MichiganWestern Michigan University
The study described in this article investigates the relationship between high school size and student learning. We used three waves of data from NELS:88 and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) methods to examine how students achievement growth in two subjects (reading and mathematics) over the high school years is influenced by the size of the high school they attend. Three research questions guided the study: (a) Which size high school is most effective for students learning?, (b) In which size high school is learning most equitably distributed?, and (c) Are size effects consistent across high schools defined by their social compositions? Results suggest that the ideal high school, defined in terms of effectiveness (i.e., learning), enrolls between 600 and 900 students. In schools smaller than this, students learn less; those in large high schools (especially over 2,100) learn considerably less. Learning is more equitable in very small schools, with equity defined by the relationship between learning and student socioeconomic status (SES).
An important finding from the study is that the influence of school size on learning is different in schools that enroll students of varying SES and in schools with differing proportions of minorities. Enrollment size has a stronger effect on learning in schools with lower-SES students and also in schools with high concentrations of minority students. Implications for educational policy are discussed.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 3,
205-227 (1997)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737019003205

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Honig
No Small Thing: School District Central Office Bureaucracies and the Implementation of New Small Autonomous Schools Initiatives
American Educational Research Journal,
June 1, 2009;
46(2):
387 - 422.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-C. Yi, C.-I. Wu, Y.-H. Chang, and M.-Y. Chang
The Psychological Well-Being of Taiwanese Youth: School versus Family Context from Early to Late Adolescence
International Sociology,
May 1, 2009;
24(3):
397 - 429.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Leithwood and D. Jantzi
A Review of Empirical Evidence About School Size Effects: A Policy Perspective
Review of Educational Research,
March 1, 2009;
79(1):
464 - 490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Kahne, S. E. Sporte, M. de la Torre, and J. Q. Easton
Small High Schools on a Larger Scale: The Impact of School Conversions in Chicago
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
September 1, 2008;
30(3):
281 - 315.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Berry and M. R. West
Growing Pains: The School Consolidation Movement and Student Outcomes
J. Law Econ. Organ.,
August 28, 2008;
(2008)
ewn015v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. N. Grubb
Multiple Resources, Multiple Outcomes: Testing the "Improved"School Finance With NELS88
American Educational Research Journal,
March 1, 2008;
45(1):
104 - 144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. B. Stewart
School Structural Characteristics, Student Effort, Peer Associations, and Parental Involvement: The Influence of School- and Individual-Level Factors on Academic Achievement
Education and Urban Society,
January 1, 2008;
40(2):
179 - 204.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mac Iver
What Reform Left Behind: A Decade of Change at One Urban High School
Education and Urban Society,
November 1, 2007;
40(1):
3 - 35.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. V. Crooks, K. L. Scott, D. A. Wolfe, D. Chiodo, and S. Killip
Understanding the Link Between Childhood Maltreatment and Violent Delinquency: What Do Schools Have to Add?
Child Maltreat,
August 1, 2007;
12(3):
269 - 280.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Wrigley and N. F. Lofsnaes
Schools as social and learning communities: Scotland and Norway
Improving Schools,
March 1, 2005;
8(1):
23 - 45.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Yamaguchi, P. M. O'Malley, and L. D. Johnston
Relationships Between School Drug Searches and Student Substance Use in U.S. Schools
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
January 1, 2004;
26(4):
329 - 341.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Ilg and J. D. Massucci
Comprehensive Urban High School: Are there Better Options for Poor and Minority Children?
Education and Urban Society,
November 1, 2003;
36(1):
63 - 78.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Davison, N. Kwak, Y. S. Seo, and J. Choi
Using Hierarchical Linear Models to Examine Moderator Effects: Person-by-Organization Interactions
Organizational Research Methods,
July 1, 2002;
5(3):
231 - 254.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Sanders
Would Privatization of K-12 Schooling Lead to Competition and Thereby Improve Education? An Industrial Organization Analysis
Educational Policy,
May 1, 2002;
16(2):
264 - 287.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Rice
Explaining the Negative Impact of the Transition from Middle to High School on Student Performance in Mathematics and Science
Educational Administration Quarterly,
August 1, 2001;
37(3):
372 - 400.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. E. Lee, D. D. Ready, and D. J. Johnson
The Difficulty of Identifying Rare Samples to Study: The Case of High Schools Divided Into Schools-Within-Schools
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
January 1, 2001;
23(4):
365 - 379.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. E. Lee and S. Loeb
School Size in Chicago Elementary Schools: Effects on Teachers' Attitudes and Students' Achievement
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 2000;
37(1):
3 - 31.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Stiefel, R. Berne, P. Iatarola, and N. Fruchter
High School Size: Effects on Budgets and Performance in New York City
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
January 1, 2000;
22(1):
27 - 39.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Berends
Teacher-Reported Effects of New American School Designs: Exploring Relationships to Teacher Background and School Context
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
January 1, 2000;
22(1):
65 - 82.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Riehl
The Principal's Role in Creating Inclusive Schools for Diverse Students: A Review of Normative, Empirical, and Critical Literature on the Practice of Educational Administration
Review of Educational Research,
January 1, 2000;
70(1):
55 - 81.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. E. Lee, B. A. Smerdon, C. Alfeld-Liro, and S. L. Brown
Inside Large and Small High Schools: Curriculum and Social Relations
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
January 1, 2000;
22(2):
147 - 171.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. M. Marks and K. S. Louis
Teacher Empowerment and the Capacity for Organizational Learning
Educational Administration Quarterly,
December 1, 1999;
35(5):
707 - 750.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. Wraga
Repudiation, Reinvention, and Educational Reform: The Comprehensive High School in Historical Perspective
Educational Administration Quarterly,
April 1, 1999;
35(2):
292 - 304.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. D. Fusarelli
Reinventing Urban Education in Texas: Charter Schools, Smaller Schools, and the New Institutionalism
Education and Urban Society,
January 1, 1999;
31(2):
214 - 224.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|