|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 3,
205-227 (1992)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737014003205
Middle School Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Science and Mathematics
Thomas B. Hoffer
Northern Illinois University
This paper analyzes the effects of middle school ability grouping on cognitive achievement in mathematics and science. In contrast to most previous research on tracking, this analysis compares outcomes in grouped and nongrouped schools. The hypotheses tested here are, first, that ability grouping raises the aggregate level of student achievement and, second, that ability grouping achieves this end by increasing the learning of all students. Comparing average student achievement growth from the seventh to the ninth grades in grouped and nongrouped schools shows that overall gains from ability grouping in either subject are negligible, controlling for differences in student social background and initial levels of achievement. Comparing the achievement growth of nongrouped students and high- and low-group students shows that high-group placement generally has a weak positive effect while low-group placement has a stronger negative effect. Ability grouping thus appears to benefit advanced students, to harm slower students, and to have a negligible overall effect as the benefits and liabilities cancel each other out.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Robinson
Evidence of a Differential Effect of Ability Grouping on the Reading Achievement Growth of Language-Minority Hispanics
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
June 1, 2008;
30(2):
141 - 180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Darling-Hammond
Third Annual Brown Lecture in Education Research The Flat Earth and Education: How America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future
Educational Researcher,
August 1, 2007;
36(6):
318 - 334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Neihart
The Socioaffective Impact of Acceleration and Ability Grouping: Recommendations for Best Practice
Gifted Child Quarterly,
January 1, 2007;
51(4):
330 - 341.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Leow, S. Marcus, E. Zanutto, and R. Boruch
Effects of Advanced Course-taking on Math and Science Achievement: Addressing Selection Bias Using Propensity Scores
American Journal of Evaluation,
December 1, 2004;
25(4):
461 - 478.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B. Burns and D. A. Mason
Class Formation and Composition in Elementary Schools
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1998;
35(4):
739 - 772.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gamoran, A. C. Porter, J. Smithson, and P. A. White
Upgrading High School Mathematics Instruction: Improving Learning Opportunities for Low-Achieving, Low-Income Youth
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
January 1, 1997;
19(4):
325 - 338.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Darling-Hammond
The Right to Learn and the Advancement of Teaching: Research, Policy, and Practice for Democratic Education
Educational Researcher,
August 1, 1996;
25(6):
5 - 17.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Fuligni, J. S. Eccles, and B. L. Barber
The Long-Term Effects of Seventh-Grade Ability Grouping in Mathematics
The Journal of Early Adolescence,
February 1, 1995;
15(1):
58 - 89.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gamoran, M. Nystrand, M. Berends, and P. C. LePore
An Organizational Analysis of the Effects of Ability Grouping
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1995;
32(4):
687 - 715.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Braddock II and J. M. McPartland
Chapter 4: Education of Early Adolescents
Review of Research in Education,
January 1, 1993;
19(1):
135 - 170.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|