Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffer, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 3, 205-227 (1992)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737014003205


Articles

Middle School Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Science and Mathematics

Thomas B. Hoffer

Northern Illinois University

This paper analyzes the effects of middle school ability grouping on cognitive achievement in mathematics and science. In contrast to most previous research on tracking, this analysis compares outcomes in grouped and nongrouped schools. The hypotheses tested here are, first, that ability grouping raises the aggregate level of student achievement and, second, that ability grouping achieves this end by increasing the learning of all students. Comparing average student achievement growth from the seventh to the ninth grades in grouped and nongrouped schools shows that overall gains from ability grouping in either subject are negligible, controlling for differences in student social background and initial levels of achievement. Comparing the achievement growth of nongrouped students and high- and low-group students shows that high-group placement generally has a weak positive effect while low-group placement has a stronger negative effect. Ability grouping thus appears to benefit advanced students, to harm slower students, and to have a negligible overall effect as the benefits and liabilities cancel each other out.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
J. P. Robinson
Evidence of a Differential Effect of Ability Grouping on the Reading Achievement Growth of Language-Minority Hispanics
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, June 1, 2008; 30(2): 141 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
L. Darling-Hammond
Third Annual Brown Lecture in Education Research The Flat Earth and Education: How America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future
Educational Researcher, August 1, 2007; 36(6): 318 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Gifted Child QuarterlyHome page
M. Neihart
The Socioaffective Impact of Acceleration and Ability Grouping: Recommendations for Best Practice
Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2007; 51(4): 330 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
C. Leow, S. Marcus, E. Zanutto, and R. Boruch
Effects of Advanced Course-taking on Math and Science Achievement: Addressing Selection Bias Using Propensity Scores
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2004; 25(4): 461 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
R. B. Burns and D. A. Mason
Class Formation and Composition in Elementary Schools
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1998; 35(4): 739 - 772.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
A. Gamoran, A. C. Porter, J. Smithson, and P. A. White
Upgrading High School Mathematics Instruction: Improving Learning Opportunities for Low-Achieving, Low-Income Youth
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1997; 19(4): 325 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
L. Darling-Hammond
The Right to Learn and the Advancement of Teaching: Research, Policy, and Practice for Democratic Education
Educational Researcher, August 1, 1996; 25(6): 5 - 17.
[PDF]


Home page
The Journal of Early AdolescenceHome page
A. J. Fuligni, J. S. Eccles, and B. L. Barber
The Long-Term Effects of Seventh-Grade Ability Grouping in Mathematics
The Journal of Early Adolescence, February 1, 1995; 15(1): 58 - 89.
[Abstract]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
A. Gamoran, M. Nystrand, M. Berends, and P. C. LePore
An Organizational Analysis of the Effects of Ability Grouping
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1995; 32(4): 687 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
J. H. Braddock II and J. M. McPartland
Chapter 4: Education of Early Adolescents
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1993; 19(1): 135 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page