This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Firestone, W. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Using Reform: Conceptualizing District Initiative

Rutgers University

This paper explores the phenomenon of district use of state reform. Past research suggests that local districts will comply minimally with mandates and respond to inducements with varying degrees of opportunism. Active use entails anticipating state responses or doing more than the state requires. Evidence is presented to illustrate that active use does exist. Existing research suggests that active users have the will and the capacity to respond positively. Will comes from a dominant coalition that believes it can set its own agenda and sees the reforms as ways to meet its own ends. Capacity comes through the formation of a temporary system that effectively manages key change functions and linkages with local schools.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 2, 151-164 (1989)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737011002151


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Mangin Literacy Coach Role Implementation: How District Context Influences Reform Efforts Educational Administration Quarterly, December 1, 2009; 45(5): 759 - 792. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Cosner Building Organizational Capacity Through Trust Educational Administration Quarterly, April 1, 2009; 45(2): 248 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. Spillane Policy, Politics, and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Topology, Functions, and Limits Educational Researcher, December 1, 2008; 37(9): 638 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Leithwood and B. Mascall Collective Leadership Effects on Student Achievement Educational Administration Quarterly, October 1, 2008; 44(4): 529 - 561. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. K. Rorrer, L. Skrla, and J. J. Scheurich Districts as Institutional Actors in Educational Reform Educational Administration Quarterly, August 1, 2008; 44(3): 307 - 357. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Wamba Book Review: Democratic Dilemmas: Joint Work, Education Politics, and Community, by J. A. Marsh. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2007 Educational Administration Quarterly, August 1, 2008; 44(3): 436 - 442. [PDF]

				H. Borko, S. A. Wolf, G. Simone, and K. P. Uchiyama Schools in Transition: Reform Efforts and School Capacity in Washington State Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2003; 25(2): 171 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Camburn, B. Rowan, and J. E. Taylor Distributed Leadership in Schools: The Case of Elementary Schools Adopting Comprehensive School Reform Models Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2003; 25(4): 347 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Mayrowetz and C. S. Weinstein Sources of Leadership for Inclusive Education: Creating Schools for All Children Educational Administration Quarterly, August 1, 1999; 35(3): 423 - 449. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. Spillane State Policy and the Non-Monolithic Nature of the Local School District: Organizational and Professional Considerations American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1998; 35(1): 33 - 63. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Chrispeels Educational Policy Implementation in a Shifting Political Climate: The California Experience American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(3): 453 - 481. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Wall Introducing new tests into traditional systems: insights from general education and from innovation theory Language Testing, November 1, 1996; 13(3): 334 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. A. Firestone and B. Nagle Differential Regulation: Clever Customization Or Unequal Interference? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1995; 17(1): 97 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. S. BARNETT and E. C. FREDE Early Childhood Programs in the Public Schools: Insights from a State Survey Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1993; 17(4): 396 - 413. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. G. Wills and K. D. Peterson External Pressures for Reform and Strategy Formation at the District Level: Superintendents' Interpretations of State Demands Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1992; 14(3): 241 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. A. Firestone and B. D. Bader Professionalism or Bureaucracy? Redesigning Teaching Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1991; 13(1): 67 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]