Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jimenez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lockheed, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Enhancing Girls’ Learning Through Single-Sex Education: Evidence and a Policy Conundrum

Emmanuel Jimenez and Marlaine E. Lockheed

The World Bank

A key consideration in the policy debate on the appropriate role of single-sex education in predominantly coeducational school systems is relative benefit for male and female students. This paper analyzes the relative performance of single-sex education and coeducation in Thailand in enhancing eighth-grade male and female student scores on standardized mathematics tests, holding constant student background, peer, and school characteristics. Its main conclusions are that (a) single-sex schooling is more effective for female students and coeducational schooling is more effective for male students in improving student performance in mathematics and (b) these differentials are largely due to peer effects rather than to specific characteristics of single-sex and coeducational classrooms or schools.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 2, 117-142 (1989)
DOI: 10.3102/01623737011002117


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
F. A. Mael
Single-Sex and Coeducational Schooling: Relationships to Socioemotional and Academic Development
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1998; 68(2): 101 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
S. S. Klein, P. E. Ortman, P. Campbell, S. Greenberg, S. Hollingsworth, J. Jacobs, B. Kachuck, A. McClelland, D. Pollard, D. Sadker, et al.
Continuing the Journey Toward Gender Equity
Educational Researcher, November 1, 1994; 23(8): 13 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
B. Fuller and P. Clarke
Raising School Effects While Ignoring Culture? Local Conditions and the Influence of Classroom Tools, Rules, and Pedagogy
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1994; 64(1): 119 - 157.
[Abstract] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page